Pasture Cash Rental Rates
One of the most common questions fielded by Extension pertains to rental rates. In Illinois, pasture land can be variable not just county to county, but also farm to farm. Because of this variation, a producer needs to use tools and resources as a guide in renting pasture, but ultimately the value or rental rate is a figure that can be agreed upon by the two parties involved in the rental agreement.
Websites, such as USDA’s National Agriculture Statistics Service, can be extremely beneficial when obtaining a base price. They allow a producer to reference survey data for renting pasture within their county. Understanding the information provided is the most important part. For instance, Pike county’s average pasture rental rate was $55/acre in 2010. In 2016, it had dropped to $42/acre. However, between these years the price had fluctuated even more so.
Many factors, such as acreage, terrain, forest, water access, quality of fence, ease of loading/unloading, and others, play an integral part in determining the rental rate per pasture.
The number listed on the NASS site is an average of survey responses for that county. Even in one county, the pasture rent can vary. One producer that has been renting land from the same owner for generations could be paying less than a renter that has just started. For instance, if an average for one county reads to be $33/acre one producer could be paying $10/acre while another pays $56/acre.
Some producers will pay pasture rent based on the land value. A rule of thumb for charging rented land is to take the overall value of the land and multiply it by 3%. For example, if a land owner paid $3,400/acre for pasture than the expected rent for that land would be $102/acre. This is a popular method in row crop, cash rent formulas and is just one way to calculate your own pasture rent value.
Knowing there are several factors that dictate rent value, it truly only matters if a renter and land owner can agree on a price. Be willing to negotiate and come into the discussion open minded. This will ensure the best results for both involved individuals
Calculating Your Own Pasture Rent
There are many factors that play a role in determining pasture rent. While looking at tables, graphs, and maps can be helpful, it may be beneficial to calculate rent based off of hay price, land value, or stocking rate. Every situation is unique and for that there are many different calculations that can be made to determine the rent for any pasture.
Options for calculating pasture rent:
- Based off of hay price (forage value)
- Percentage of land value
- Using AUM value
Forage Value
This method is based on the amount of forage that the land will produce and what hay is worth. To use this equation for calculating pasture rent, start with the value of the hay and subtract the costs to harvest the forage, to transport the livestock, and the time needed to travel and check livestock. The end number will give a maximum that would be paid for the forage.
- Formula: [Value of hay/ton—expenses = max. value of pasture rent]
Also, suggested by Iowa State Extension Economists, producers can take the value of their hay and multiply it by 25% or 35% depending upon type of forage. Use a 25% for grass hay during grazing season for pasture, and 35% for an established hay stand.
- Formula: [Price of hay/ton x 25% or 35% depending on forage = rent/acre]
Return on Investment
Another option for determining pasture rent is using the Return on Investment method. This is usually based upon interest rates at a bank. Right now, that rate is considerably lower around 3 to 4%. This means that if you can buy an acre of land for $3,400 and your bank is charging you an interest rate of 4% on your loan you can break even on payments if you are charging $136/acre of pasture. This method is especially popular for tillable, row crop land, but can still be useful for setting a base price for pasture rent.
- Formula: [$3400/acre x 4% = $136/acre].
AUM (Animal Unit Months)
This value can be useful when stocking rate is fluctuated on an average. This method is a formula that uses forage quality and price of hay and makes it easy to plug in numbers to get quick results. One AUM is the amount of forage that a 1,000 lb. cow will need to sustain herself and her calf for 30 days, roughly 26.1 pounds per day.
C = Pasture Quality Factor | Description |
---|---|
0.12 | Unimproved, poor condition |
0.15 | Fair to good pasture management |
0.18 | Very good pasture management |
0.20 | Excellent meadow (grass and legumes) |
0.22 | Lush legume pasture |
- Formula: [Number of Animal Units x Average Hay Price Out of the Field Per Ton x Pasture Quality Factor = Rate Per Head Per Month]
Using a 1200 lb. cow with her calf at side at a time when hay is $100/ton and the pasture you are renting is of high quality grass and legumes, the equation would be as follows: 1.20 AU x $100/ton x .20 Quality Factor = $24/AUM
Remember that there are always other determining factors in price of pasture such as quality of fence, water and shade availability, proximity, quality of forage, etc., and that you as the producer have to do what works for your operation.
Grass Type | Tons/Acre | AUM/ACRE |
---|---|---|
Bluegrass, Unimproved | 1.0 to 1.5 | 3.0 |
Bluegrass, Improved (with Legume or Nitrogen) | 1.5 to 2.5 | 4.0 |
Birdsfoot Trwfoil and Grass | 3.0 to 4.0 | 5.0 |
Orchard or Brome Grass, Alone | 3.0 to 4.0 | 4.0 |
Orchard or Brome Grass (with Legume or Nitrogen) | 4.0 to 5.0 | 69.5 |
Warm Season Grasses | 4.0 to 5.0 | 4.0 |
Alfalfa, plus Grass | 4.0 to 6.0 | 6.0 |
Cornstalks | 0.5 to 1.0 | 0.7 |
* Rotational grazing can increase production about 25%. |
Sources
Regional County Averages by Year
Northwest Region
Table 1. Northwest Region | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2017 | 2016 | 2014 |
Bureau | N/A | 38 | N/A | 39 | 40 | 34 | 29 | N/A |
Carroll | 56 | 54 | 62.5 | 57 | 54.5 | 58.5 | 51 | 44 |
Henry | 51 | 54 | 39.5 | 56.5 | 56.5 | 58.5 | 54 | N/A |
Jo Daviess | 50.5 | 43.5 | 34 | 41 | 44 | N/A | 36.5 | 48.5 |
Lee | N/A | N/A | 50.5 | 63.5 | N/A | 47 | 46 | N/A |
Mercer | 42 | 48.5 | 38.5 | 42 | 45 | 50 | 41.5 | 34 |
Ogle | 59.5 | 58 | 65.5 | 54 | 57 | 64 | 48.5 | 43.5 |
Putnam | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Rock Island | 37 | 33.5 | 48.5 | 50 | 45.5 | 54 | 55.5 | 51 |
Stephenson | 69.5 | 67.5 | 76 | 80 | 70 | 60.5 | 41.5 | 53 |
Whiteside | 22 | 49.5 | 67 | 64 | 57 | 56 | 56.5 | N/A |
Winnebago | 41.5 | 38.5 | 44 | 46.5 | 47 | 53.5 | 54 | N/A |
Other Counties |
|
|
| N/A | 52 | 37.5 | N/A | 47 |
Northwest Region Avg |
|
|
|
|
| 50.5 | 46.7 | 45.9 |
Northeast Region
Table 2. Northeast Region | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2017 | 2016 | 2014 |
De Kalb | 37 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 55 | 35 | 35.5 | N/A |
Grundy | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 57 | 61.5 | N/A |
Kane | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
La Salle | 33 | N/A | 33 | 37 | 38.5 | 38.5 | 40 | N/A |
Lake | N/A | N/A | N/A | 100 | N/A | 66.5 | 99.5 | N/A |
McHenry | N/A | 43 | 45 | 48 | 48.5 | 50 | 65.5 | N/A |
Other Counties |
|
|
| 69.5 | 71 | 63.5 | 51 | 46.5 |
Northeast Region Avg |
|
|
|
|
| 50 | 59 | 46.5 |
West Region
Table 3. West Region | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2017 | 2016 | 2014 |
Adams | 50 | 49 | 46.5 | N/A | 36 | 40 | 43 | 40 |
Brown | 35.5 | 40.5 | 34.5 | 44 | 33 | 38.5 | 20 | 29.5 |
Fulton | 39.5 | 41.5 | 41.5 | 39.5 | 40 | 28 | 30.5 | 34.5 |
Hancock | 29 | 24 | 30.5 | 41 | 32 | 32.5 | 25.5 | 39 |
Henderson | 38 | 34.5 | 52 | 47 | 43 | 39 | 33.5 | 33 |
Knox | 29.5 | 34 | 37 | 36 | 34.5 | 26.5 | 29 | 28.5 |
McDonough | 40 | 39.5 | 42 | N/A | 34.5 | N/A | 41 | 25 |
Schuyler | 34 | N/A | 42.5 | 51 | 45 | N/A | 36 | 30.5 |
Warren | 38 | 37.5 | N/A | 41.5 | 40 | 37 | 39 | 57.5 |
Other Counties |
|
|
| 37 | N/A | 39 | N/A | N/A |
West Region Avg |
|
|
|
|
| 32.5 | 33.1 | 35.3 |
Central Region
Table 4. Central Region | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2017 | 2016 | 2014 |
De Witt | 44 | 53 | 43.5 | 51 | N/A | N/A | 50 | 44.5 |
Logan | 45 | 57 | 53.5 | 55 | 48 | 33.5 | 30 | 28 |
Macon | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 37.5 | N/A | 42 | 28.5 |
Marshall | 22.5 | 26 | 32 | 32 | 28 | 33.5 | 37 | 25 |
Mason | 48.5 | 46.5 | 51.5 | 48 | 44.5 | 50 | N/A | 42 |
McLean | 43.5 | 44 | 44 | N/A | N/A | 50 | 37 | 40 |
Menard | 53.5 | 48.5 | 48 | 45 | 34 | 34 | 25.5 | 28.5 |
Peoria | N/A | 22.5 | 25 | 33 | 21.5 | 31 | 30 | 35 |
Stark | N/A | N/A | N/A | 47 | N/A | 44 | N/A | 33.5 |
Tazewell | 39 | 37.5 | 36.5 | 46 | 41 | 47 | 32 | 35.5 |
Woodford | 39 | 41.5 | 37.5 | 45 | N/A | N/A | 33 | 32 |
Other Counties |
|
|
| 50.5 | 41.5 | 48.5 | 45 | N/A |
Central Region Avg |
|
|
|
|
| 40 | 36.2 | 33.9 |
East Region
Table 5. East Region | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2017 | 2016 | 2014 |
Champaign | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 63 | 55.5 | N/A | N/A |
Iroquois | N/A | N/A | N/A | 44 | 52 | 55 | 55 | N/A |
Livingston | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 61 | 38 | 41 | N/A |
Vermillion | 49 | 60.5 | 52 | 56 | N/A | 51.5 | 48.5 | N/A |
Other Counties |
|
|
| 58 | 61 | 63 | 52.5 | 40.5 |
East Region Avg |
|
|
|
|
| 47 | 49.3 | 40.5 |
West Southwest Region
Table 6. West Southwest Region | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2017 | 2016 | 2014 |
Bond | 69.5 | N/A | 24 | 33 | 38 | 44 | N/A | 41.5 |
Calhoun | 28 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Cass | 32 | 30 | N/A | 40 | 44.5 | 26.5 | 27 | 30 |
Christian | 47 | 59.5 | 53.5 | 48 | 38 | 40 | 36.5 | N/A |
Greene | 31 | 36.5 | 37.5 | 45 | 40.5 | 32 | 29.5 | 27 |
Jersey | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 35 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Macoupin | N/A | 39 | 46.5 | 37 | 31 | 33.5 | 33 | 33 |
Madison | 50.5 | N/A | 38 | N/A | 50 | 32 | 37.5 | N/A |
Montgomery | 25 | N/A | 45 | 39 | 30.5 | 35.5 | 34 | 31 |
Morgan | 32 | 39.5 | 33 | 33 | 28.5 | 30 | 24 | 22.5 |
Pike | 42 | 42.5 | 44.5 | 40 | 37 | 41 | 42 | 32 |
Sangamon | 33 | 38 | 41 | 45 | 37 | 37.5 | 41 | 40.5 |
Scott | N/A | 34 | 29.5 | N/A | N/A | 31.5 | N/A | N/A |
Other Counties |
|
|
| 33 | 32 | 32.5 | 33 | 35 |
West Southwest Region Avg |
|
|
|
|
| 34.5 | 33.8 | 32.5 |
East Southeast Region
Table 7. East Southeast Region | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2017 | 2016 | 2014 |
Clark | 40 | 39.5 | N/A | N/A | 38 | 36.5 | 34.5 | 40 |
Clay | 45 | 56.5 | 38.5 | 42 | 31.5 | 34.5 | N/A | 48 |
Coles | 59 | 52 | N/A | 62 | 35.5 | 71 | N/A | 84.5 |
Crawford | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Cumberland | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Douglas | 50.5 | 48.5 | N/A | N/A | 39.5 | 43.5 | 43 | 41 |
Edgar | 51.5 | 45.5 | 51 | 42 | 44.5 | 44 | 40 | 46 |
Effingham | N/A | N/A | 42.5 | 31.5 | 41.5 | 42.5 | 40 | 54.5 |
Fayette | 47 | 47 | 31.5 | 31.5 | 35 | 34.5 | 21.5 | 28.5 |
Jasper | 34.5 | 39.5 | 41 | 44 | 35 | 36 | 37.5 | 34.5 |
Marion | 46.5 | 56 | 38 | 34 | 30 | 31 | 29.5 | 34.5 |
Moultrie | 52 | N/A | N/A | 51 | 54 | 55 | N/A | N/A |
Richland | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 50 | N/A | N/A |
Shelby | N/A | 48.5 | 51 | 38 | 43 | 37.5 | 38.5 | 27 |
Other Counties |
|
|
| 43 | 28.5 | 35 | 41.5 | 55.5 |
East Southeast Region Avg |
|
|
|
|
| 38 | 36.2 | 44.9 |
Southwest Region
Table 8. Southwest Region | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2017 | 2016 | 2014 |
Alexander | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Clinton | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 40 | 31.5 | 31 | 38 |
Jackson | 36.5 | 30.5 | 35 | 32 | 25 | 28.5 | 23 | 27 |
Monroe | N/A | N/A | 40.5 | 34 | 31.5 | N/A | 29 | 37 |
Perry | 27.5 | 29.5 | 34 | 27 | 32 | 26.5 | 26 | 24 |
Pulaski | N/A | N/A | N/A | 38 | 32.5 | 34 | 33.5 | N/A |
Randolph | 25.5 | 34 | 38.5 | 34 | N/A | 37 | 33 | 26 |
St. Clair | 27 | 36.5 | N/A | 37 | 40 | 27.5 | 22.5 | 45 |
Union | N/A | 38 | 36 | 29 | 38.5 | N/A | 28.5 | 33.5 |
Washington | 29 | 28 | 29 | N/A | N/A | 29.5 | 38.5 | 40 |
Williamson | 16.5 | 26 | N/A | 20 | 16.5 | 24 | 31 | 20 |
Other Counties |
|
|
| 32 | 34.5 | 26 | 24 | 29.5 |
Southwest Region Avg |
|
|
|
|
| 28.5 | 29.1 | 32 |
Southeast Region
Table 9. Southeast Region | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2017 | 2016 | 2014 |
Edwards | N/A | N/A | 24 | N/A | 29.5 | N/A | 29 | 38 |
Franklin | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Gallatin | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 28.5 | 37 |
Jefferson | N/A | 24 | 31.5 | 39 | N/A | 33.5 | 34 | 35.5 |
Massac | 34.5 | 34 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 35 | 38 | 37.5 |
Pope | 23.5 | 25 | 33 | 40 | N/A | 24 | 25 | 37.5 |
Saline | N/A | 31.5 | N/A | 35 | 38 | 39.5 | 31 | 40.5 |
Wayne | 50.5 | 48 | N/A | 51 | 54.5 | 53.5 | 45.5 | N/A |
White | 34.5 | N/A | 45.5 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 34.5 |
Other Counties |
|
|
| 38.5 | 54 | 44 | 34.5 | 46 |
Southeast Region Avg |
|
|
|
|
| 38.5 | 33.1 | 38.1 |